A Developer’s Guide to Understanding Cloud Bills (AWS, GCP, Azure)
Translate cloud invoices into the Kubernetes resources you ship—nodes, storage, load balancers, and egress.
We built a calculator to settle the debate. Compare Google GKE (Autopilot/Standard) vs AWS EKS pricing side-by-side using our new free tool.
The “AWS vs Google Cloud” debate usually ends with “it depends.” But when it comes to managed Kubernetes, the pricing models are surprisingly different—and one specific feature often makes GKE significantly cheaper for small-to-medium clusters.
To help you run the numbers for your specific workload, we built a free tool:
👉 Try the GKE vs EKS Calculator
The biggest difference between Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) isn’t the node price—it’s the Control Plane.
This means for a startup running a single production cluster and a single staging cluster, the math starts to tilt:
That’s an instant 50% savings on management fees.
Both clouds offer a “serverless” experience where they manage the underlying OS for you.
Fargate is true serverless. You don’t see the nodes; you just pay for vCPU/RAM.
Autopilot manages the nodes, but you can still see them.
Let’s compare the workhorses.
m5.large (2 vCPU, 8GB RAM) ≈ $0.096/houre2-standard-2 (2 vCPU, 8GB RAM) ≈ $0.067/hourGoogle’s E2 instances are cost-optimized shared-core machines that are perfect for general Kubernetes workloads. They are typically ~30% cheaper than AWS’s M5 generation.
However, AWS fights back with Graviton (ARM).
m7g.large (2 vCPU, 8GB RAM) ≈ $0.076/hourOur new calculator lets you input:
It instantly visualizes the monthly bill for both clouds, highlighting the “Free Tier” savings on GCP.
EKS becomes competitive when:
The Management of the first zonal cluster is free ($73/mo savings). You still pay for the worker nodes (EC2 equivalent) and Load Balancers.
Yes, GKE Enterprise (Anthos) allows this, but it is very expensive. Stick to standard EKS if you are on AWS.
GKE is widely considered more “batteries included.” The console is faster, and features like “Autopilot” work out of the box. EKS often requires more assembly (Terraform, Helm, IAM configurations).
If you are strictly optimizing for raw infrastructure bill—especially for < 5 clusters—GKE is the clear winner in 2025. The free control plane and cheaper E2 instances make it hard to beat.
However, “Cost” is more than your bill. It’s also your engineering time. If your team knows AWS, staying on EKS is likely cheaper than retraining everyone for GCP.
Stop guessing. Run your numbers now:
🚀 Launch GKE vs EKS Calculator
Founder
Translate cloud invoices into the Kubernetes resources you ship—nodes, storage, load balancers, and egress.
Google Kubernetes Engine vs AWS EKS. Comparing control plane fees, autopilot pricing, and node costs.
Common failures, fast wins, and the playbook we now apply on every new cluster.
Get Kubernetes and ECS cost tactics delivered weekly.