A lightweight QBR template that aligns engineering, finance, and product on spend, savings, and bets.
L
Linda Cuanca
•1 min read
Cloud budgets should be planned with engineering, not imposed on them. A 60-minute quarterly review keeps everyone aligned on what we spent, what we saved, and what we expect next.
Agenda (60 minutes)
Run-rate snapshot (10m): Current monthly spend, unit cost trends, top 5 services by dollar impact.
Variance review (10m): What changed versus last quarter—traffic, new services, infra changes.
Risks and bets (15m): Expected launches, capacity reservations expiring, new regions or GPUs.
Decision log (15m): Budgets per product, guardrails to tighten, and ownership for each action.
Inputs to prepare
90-day cost curve broken down by namespace/product.
Unit cost for key metrics: $ per 1k requests, $ per tenant, $ per TB processed.
Coverage metrics: % workloads with owner labels, LimitRange/ResourceQuota adoption, % on spot or commitments.
Optimization backlog with estimated savings and effort (S, M, L).
Outputs you should leave with
Quarterly budget by product line with a ±10% guardrail.
Top 3 optimization projects with owners and dates (e.g., “shrink staging 40% by Jan 15”).
Commitment plan for reserved/spot mix, storage lifecycle policies, and egress reductions.
Review cadence: monthly async updates plus next QBR on the calendar.
Tips to keep it real
Keep finance and product in the same meeting so tradeoffs happen live.
Use the same dashboards engineers see; avoid “finance-only” spreadsheets that trigger distrust.
Tie optimization projects to roadmap outcomes (latency, stability, gross margin), not just cost goals.
Quarterly planning is the moment to align ambition with budget. Keep it short, visual, and action-oriented, and your Kubernetes costs will track closer to the revenue they support.***